A century ago, children's books—especially those aimed at tweens—were dominated by a single force in publishing. Not a traditional publisher, but a book packager: an entity that sold stories to other publishers using a strict, profit-driven formula. The approach was simple: create a story template, then hire as many ghostwriters as possible to churn out books quickly and cheaply.
Quality was secondary. These stories didn't need deep character development or literary merit. They weren't art; they were mass-produced pulp fiction tailored for a specific audience. And they sold—massively.
This formulaic process gave us household names like Carolyn Keene, a pseudonym used by at least five different authors, and Victor Appleton, who later evolved into Victor Appleton II and III, written by an uncountable number of ghostwriters. Keene, of course, brought us Nancy Drew, while Appleton gave us Tom Swift.
Yet these were only the most famous products of this literary assembly line. The Stratemeyer Syndicate, founded by Edward Stratemeyer, was responsible for The Bobbsey Twins, The Hardy Boys, The Rover Boys, The Dana Girls, The Happy Hollisters, and many more. To call the syndicate successful would be an understatement—The Rover Boys, first published in 1899, sold over five million copies and spanned thirty books.
Despite their commercial triumph, Stratemeyer's series faced harsh criticism. They were widely dismissed as "unworthy trash," and libraries refused to carry them. Yes, for decades, Nancy Drew and Tom Swift were banned from libraries! The chief librarian of the Boy Scouts of America once claimed these books were responsible for "blowing out boys' brains," while a prominent psychologist warned they would ruin girls by giving them "false views of life."
But not my hometown library. By the time I came along, libraries had relented, and I devoured Stratemeyer's books—blissfully unaware of their literary shortcomings. To be fair, some were better than others. Mildred Benson, the original author behind the Carolyn Keene pen name, crafted some genuinely engaging Nancy Drew stories. Still, most Stratemeyer books were objectively mediocre. And I loved them.
Stratemeyer’s legacy persists—sort of. In 1984, the syndicate was sold to Simon & Schuster, and at some point, Grosset & Dunlap acquired rights to Nancy Drew and The Hardy Boys. These franchises have since appeared as short-lived CW network series, including Tom Swift. Perhaps there have been others.
So why does this matter today? Because history has a way of rhyming. What happened a century ago is happening—or about to happen—again. Replace "Stratemeyer" with "Artificial Intelligence," and we see the resurgence of mass-produced, low-quality fiction flooding the market.
I’m not arguing that AI-generated books have no place. They do, particularly in niche markets where speed and quantity trump literary excellence. However, I firmly believe that the very best books will always come from talented human authors. And the absolute finest will be created by human authors who embrace AI as a powerful tool—one that, when wielded correctly, can enhance creativity rather than replace it.
The future of storytelling belongs to those who know how to blend tradition with innovation. As we've seen before, formulas and mass production can sell books, but true artistry remains the domain of the human spirit.
As authors, we are often told to write to our niche, to identify our target audience. That is exactly what Stratemeyer did. The authors writing under his pen names were not producing literature or art; they were producing content for a market. As an author, you must choose your path—are you interested in creating your art, or simply selling books? It takes a lot of work, and no small amount of luck to do both.
Comments